So far, there is only one Silicon Valley, and it’s in California. There are several locations jockeying for the
title of “Silicon Valley East,” however, and they present an interesting
contrast of approaches toward achieving the desired title. It is easiest to envision contenders for the
Valley East title arising adjacent to existing urban areas, as several studies
indicate they are. These sites trumpet
their connection to a well-known and respected academic core, and thus their
nearness to a well-known urban center.
Cambridge, Massachusetts is the example with the most prestigious claims
(it’s hard to beat the combination of MIT and Harvard). There is also a self-designated “Silicon
Alley” in the New York City area, but, as both sites are newcomers to already
built up urban areas, neither is an actual site so much as a collection of
firms and institutions in general proximity to one another.
One contender for the title,
however, is taking a different approach, in a decidedly different
location. In utter contrast to the
several urban locations, New York State’s money and political influence have converged
around the tiny village of Malta, amid the bucolic countryside northeast of
Albany, where a massive computer chip fabrication plant is currently under
construction. It is the best contender
that money—almost 2.5 billion dollars to date—and political influence (harder
to quantify, but considerable) can create, more or less out of nothing.
Building a Silicon Valley East in an undeveloped area presents an
opportunity to design, pretty much from scratch, an integrated physical
plant—workplaces, residences, services and transportation infrastructure—for a
modern, energy-efficient community. This
would be extraordinarily difficult (not to mention expensive) to achieve in an
already long established urban or semi-urban location, but what about when you
can plan everything from the start?
Would not such an overall design testify to the future the products of
the complex will help to bring about, and become itself an advertisement for
and boost to the location’s future? If
the employment predictions of those associated with this project are to be
believed, then Malta presents an opportunity to design just such a
forward-thinking, integrated community, one truly worthy of the name. The chances of achieving such a goal depend
on a great many things, and one’s definition of “community” should be at the
top of the list. So far, in Malta, such thinking does not seem very prevalent.
First, some background behind the development. While Albany’s Capital Region cannot match the academic credentials of Boston or New York City, it is home to the State University of New York at
Albany’s College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, a widely recognized
center of academic semiconductor research funded by large sums of both
government and private money. Although
this new College sports the trendy name, the much-longer existence of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in nearby Troy probably adds more cachet to the
underlying requirement for an academic core.
The main attraction in Malta itself is land, “undeveloped” land, and lots of it. This would appear to be a significant card in the game, if the nature of the area’s first major business is any indication. That business is GlobalFoundries, a company formed from the spinoff of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) chip fabrication facilities in Dresden, Germany, merged with Chartered Semiconductor's operations in Singapore. The company is actually owned by the Advanced Technology Investment Company (ATIC), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Government of Abu Dhabi. The Malta site is known as "Fab 8”. “Fab” stands for “fabrication,” as GF actually produces physical products here. These products are microchips, in sizes I can grasp only conceptually. Still, in what must be one of the more ironic results of the digital revolution, the production of microchips seems to require macro fabs. I believe that if you stood at one end of this fab and peered to its opposite end, you could see the curve of the earth. Even if I exaggerate (and that is possible), the GF grounds are already immense, and are simultaneously a construction site for even more expansion.
The main attraction in Malta itself is land, “undeveloped” land, and lots of it. This would appear to be a significant card in the game, if the nature of the area’s first major business is any indication. That business is GlobalFoundries, a company formed from the spinoff of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) chip fabrication facilities in Dresden, Germany, merged with Chartered Semiconductor's operations in Singapore. The company is actually owned by the Advanced Technology Investment Company (ATIC), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Government of Abu Dhabi. The Malta site is known as "Fab 8”. “Fab” stands for “fabrication,” as GF actually produces physical products here. These products are microchips, in sizes I can grasp only conceptually. Still, in what must be one of the more ironic results of the digital revolution, the production of microchips seems to require macro fabs. I believe that if you stood at one end of this fab and peered to its opposite end, you could see the curve of the earth. Even if I exaggerate (and that is possible), the GF grounds are already immense, and are simultaneously a construction site for even more expansion.
GF is both the pioneer and a sizable attraction for those seeking to
either locate or relocate. The Luther
Forest Technology Campus has been laid out for these expected businesses. It is mostly empty (GlobalFoundries is the
sole tenant), with roads periodically split by curb curves and a foot or so of
asphalt dead-ending into raw land. The
products may be cutting edge, but the layout is depressingly familiar. Despite its trendy title it’s an industrial
park, pure and simple.
Judging just on what is visible, Malta’s future as a tech center seems
inevitably dependent on the automobile.
Plans for the area announced periodically in The Business Review seem depressingly similar in concept, with the
operative word to describe that concept being “sprawl.” The assumptions in place about future
worksites and direct access are clear.
So is the thinking behind getting to the area in the first place.
As you drive to Malta from the Albany area (there is no alternative) the
planned dependency on the automobile is clear from the significant--and
expensive--improvements to the local road infrastructure. It has obviously been planned and built with
greater traffic in mind than that which now occupies it. Much of the expenditures for the expected
development of the Malta area have gone into the construction of roads and
bridges to expedite the journey of these anticipated greater numbers to and
from it. The new intersection #6 off
I-87, for example, is a single-point urban interchange (SPUI), designed, as
Wikipedia puts it, “to help move large volumes of traffic through limited
amounts of space safely and efficiently.” Those traversing it for the first time can
find it well, disconcerting.
SPUI Intersection off I-87 |
There is also an agreement in place requiring GlobalFoundries, if it
decides to build a second fab, to pay for the construction of an additional
exit off I87 between the current exit #11 and #12.
The network around Malta itself has gained
some notoriety for the seemingly unanimous agreement among those concerned with
vehicle traffic that streetlights are to be avoided at all cost. The powers that be over the area have instead
built traffic circles, known locally as “roundabouts.” They are well marked on the pavement to
quickly instruct drivers as to New York State law governing the right-of-way on
them, but nevertheless provide moments of anxiety to those not quite familiar
with the required etiquette (including your humble correspondent). The Malta area also marked the first time I
have encountered roundabouts built into the classic cloverleaf design of a
limited-access highway. After you take
the Malta exit off Interstate 87 and reach the intersecting road (State Rt.
67), there are no traffic lights, stop signs or even yield signs, just a
roundabout to send you in the proper direction.
This is initially disconcerting, but does an offer an easier way to
correct initial mistakes.
Once you have completed your journey, the best way to describe the
village of Malta is to say that when you get there, there is no there
there. I exaggerate, but only
slightly. There is a village here, and
there has been for some time. Prior to
the Big Change, Malta was not a destination, merely the intersection of U.S.
Rt. 9 and N.Y. Rt. 67. In saying this, I
am being unfair to the residents who were (and still are) there, but in view of
what they have had to put up with (not to mention what is coming), I do not
believe I am adding any great burden.
The residents of Malta are also not taking things lying down by any
means (see photo), but their ability to affect the enormous financial and
political process taking place about them is most likely negligible. A hand-painted sign on a backhoe
sitting opposite the first residential apartment project built to accommodate
new residents provides the necessary symbolism for this unequal struggle. They try, nonetheless, as a visit to a blog
site (http://blog.timesunion.com/malta)
will attest.
The reliance on the automobile that underlies all the planning visible
so far may very prove to have been the right decision (from the point of view
of the area’s developers, of course), but it places Malta’s future as a
community in considerable jeopardy. The
workplaces seem destined to emulate the current industrial park style, but what
of the residences, service business and the like that must be added? Where will the new techies live and recreate,
and how will they get to and from work?
That future, and what alternatives exist, will be the subject of my
follow up post.